Housing Meeting Blocked in Bridgeton!
Glasgow Games Monitor 2014 housing meeting blocked by Bridgeton Community Learning Campus (BCLC).
The Board of Directors at Bridgeton Community Learning Campus (BCLC) have closed down the joint housing meeting booked by Glasgow Games Monitor 2014 and Unite Community Union for Tuesday 18th March. We were informed of this decision on Thursday 13th March after spending considerable time and energy flyering the local area and putting up posters in shops. We are very angry about this obviously politically motivated decision and have decided to make our response public. The response we received from the centre manager on behalf of the Board is here:
“It has come to my attention that you have a booking with us for Tuesday the 18th March. The staff who took your request to hire our facilities were under the impression that it was a rep meeting for Unite Union and i have since discovered that this is not the case.
Bridgeton Community Learning Campus pride themselves in raising the hopes and aspirations of our community and it’s residents and on this occasion the Board of Directors have decided that your public meeting does not fit the criteria for this.
To date i have had no complaints or concerns in regards to a housing crisis, however, If this was the case then Bridgeton Community Learning Campus would seek to involve the appropriate parties in order to deal with it as amicably as possible without creating unnecessary unrest. Bridgeton Community Learning Campus apologise for the late cancellation of your booking“.
At no point where we asked to clarify our intentions before the meeting was blocked. Three things should be pointed out immediately:
1. At no point did we say it was a rep meeting for Unite Community Union. We told the centre it was a public housing meeting organised by Glasgow Games Monitor 2014 and Unite the Community Union. We could not have been more clear. Why would we need to book the full hall for a rep meeting? Also, in our initial correspondence with staff at the centre we were asked how many chairs we required for our public meeting. This question was recently asked again when we put up a poster in the centre itself. This makes it abundantly clear that the nature of the event was transparent and understood by the staff who were helpful and friendly in discussion. The response from the board above is a complete misrepresentation.
2. The term ‘housing crisis’ refers to a widespread situation at a local, national and international levels, it is to do with the massive reductions in social housing and the expansion of private sector housing. Between 1981 and 2006, for instance, Glasgow lost 60,000 social homes and added 60,000 private homes. It is to do with punishing rents, gentrification, the expansion of personal and national debt, demolition and displacement. The National Housing Federation say that half of all people’s disposable income is taken up by rent, in ten years time this will rise to 57%. We will be doing a primer on housing in the East End and Glasgow very soon which will lay out what we mean by ‘housing crisis’ much more clearly. All this is widely understood by the mainstream media and by organisations and charities such as the Scottish Tenants Organisation, Shelter, Child Poverty Action Group and the National Federation of Housing. The list could easily be extended but the point should be obvious to anyone – apart, that is, from the extremely complacent Board of Directors at BCLC.
But then maybe housing isn’t a worry for recent directors at BCLC, like disgraced Ronnie Saez who was handed a £500,000 severance package from the now defunct Glasgow East Regeneration Agency (GEAR) allegedly set up to tackle poverty in the East End. Or, one time director, George Redmond, the Labour Councillor for Calton who told Margaret Jaconelli to “take it on the the chin” when 100 police officers violently evicted her from her home to clear the way for the Games Village.
We have previously taken to task duplicitous claims about housing provision through the Commonwealth Games and Clyde Gateway. Clyde Gateway have claimed they will build 10,000 homes in the East End but when we pressed them they said they had made the figure up to obtain more public funding and had no idea how many of these imagined homes would be for social rent. Surely this merits wider debate? These seemingly locally specific questions cannot be isolated from the wider housing crisis which we refer to above, and this is precisely what we wanted to begin discussing at the meeting. The complacency reflected in BCLC’s response is indicative of a wider malaise in ‘community’ organisations across the board which (with some honourable exceptions) have long since been incorporated by property-led ‘regeneration’ agencies losing their critical bite in the process. Of course, one person’s housing crisis is another persons rental profit, but it is clear that housing tenure and costs have a disproportionate effect on underprivileged areas such as the East End of Glasgow and that ‘crisis’ is a legitimate term to use in this context.